The Lexicon of British Common Law
The execution of Charles Stuart (Charles I of England) in 1649 sets a historical precedent for considering the removal of rights and freedoms as a serious offense against the people. Here's a case for drawing parallels between this event and modern-day concerns about erosion of rights and freedoms:
*Historical Context*
- *The English Civil War*: The conflict between the monarchy and Parliament led to the trial and execution of Charles I for "high treason" against his people. The charge was based on his actions, which included:
- *Imposing arbitrary rule*: Charles I was accused of ruling without Parliament's consent, disregarding established laws and traditions.
- *Levying taxes without consent*: He imposed taxes without Parliament's approval, which was seen as a violation of subjects' rights and liberties.
- *Using force against his subjects*: Charles I was accused of using military force against his people, leading to bloodshed and suffering.
*Parallels to Modern-Day Concerns*
- *Erosion of Rights and Freedoms*: When governments or institutions remove or restrict fundamental rights and freedoms, such as free speech, expression, or assembly, it can be seen as a betrayal of the people's trust.
- *Abuse of Power*: The concentration of power and the disregard for established laws and procedures can lead to abuses of authority, undermining the rule of law and democratic principles.
*Treason Against the People*
- *Historical Precedent*: The execution of Charles I establishes a precedent for holding those in power accountable for their actions when they betray the trust of their people.
- *Modern-Day Implications*: Drawing on this historical precedent, one could argue that the removal of rights and freedoms without consent or justification can be considered a form of treason against the people.
*Conclusion*
The case of Charles I's execution serves as a reminder of the importance of protecting individual rights and freedoms. By recognising the historical parallels between the past and present, we can better understand the significance of preserving democratic principles and holding those in power accountable for their actions.
In the UK, common law plays a significant role in shaping legal principles, including those related to free speech. However, the relationship between common law and statutory law is complex.
While common law provides a foundation for certain rights and freedoms, Parliament has the authority to enact statutes that can modify or override common law principles. This is known as parliamentary supremacy.
In practice, this means that an Act of Parliament can indeed impact the exercise of free speech, even if it is rooted in common law. Courts may interpret statutes in light of common law principles, but ultimately, the statute takes precedence.
We're exploring this topic further for policy formulation along the following lines. Millions have died in protecting British rights and freedoms which are being removed by political ideologies
*LEXICON OF BRITISH COMMON LAW ACT*
*Preamble*
WHEREAS the common law of England and Wales has evolved over centuries to protect fundamental rights and liberties; AND WHEREAS it is essential to codify and safeguard these principles for future generations;
*Article I: Codification*
1. The Lexicon of British Common Law (hereinafter "the Lexicon") shall be established as a comprehensive codification of the fundamental principles and rights derived from the common law of England and Wales.
2. The Lexicon shall include, but not be limited to, principles relating to:
a. Freedom of speech and expression
b. Freedom of assembly and association
c. Protection against arbitrary detention and due process
d. Protection of property rights
e. Other fundamental rights and liberties
*Article II: Supremacy of Common Law*
1. The Lexicon shall have paramount authority in the interpretation and application of the law.
2. No statute or statutory instrument shall be construed to override or modify any principle or right codified in the Lexicon, unless:
a. The statute or statutory instrument explicitly states its intention to do so; AND
b. A national referendum has been held, and a majority of votes cast have approved the modification or override.
*Article III: Judicial Review*
1. The judiciary shall have the power to review and strike down any statute or statutory instrument that contravenes the Lexicon.
2. In exercising this power, the judiciary shall consider:
a. The plain meaning of the Lexicon
b. The legislative intent behind the statute or statutory instrument
*Article IV: Implementation and Enforcement*
1. The Lord Chancellor shall be responsible for ensuring the effective implementation and enforcement of the Lexicon.
2. The judiciary shall receive training on the application and interpretation of the Lexicon.
3. An oversight mechanism shall be established to monitor the implementation and enforcement of the Lexicon.
*Article V: Review and Revision*
1. The Lexicon shall be reviewed periodically to ensure its continued relevance and effectiveness.
2. Any proposed revisions to the Lexicon shall be subject to public consultation.
*Article VI: Transitional Provisions*
1. This Act shall come into force on a date passed to the Lord Chancellor.
2. Existing statutes and statutory instruments shall be reviewed and revised as necessary to ensure consistency with the Lexicon.
*Article VII: Citation*
This Act may be cited as the:
Lexicon of British Common Law Act [Year].
This proposed law aims to establish the Lexicon as a foundational document, protecting fundamental rights and liberties while providing a framework for their evolution and adaptation.
So, we are solidifying and codifying into the Lexicon of British Common Law.
enshrined within our articles of the Lexicon of British Common Law are the protection of FREE SPEECH, FREE EXPRESSION, FREE THOUGHT etc for every single British Citizen on these beautiful British Islands. Everyone!
Now, we all have these rights and freedoms from birth, or we don't. Now, here's the constitutional problem. His Majesty and Her Majesty before himself were born into a Cromwellian golden cage of SILENCE. We either all have the rights of free speech, expression, thought, movement etc or we don't?
In evolving from this Cromwellian parliamentary democracy system into the 21st Century and enshrining British Rights and Freedoms within the Lexicon then it legally follows that the Lexicon protects His Majesty King Charles lll in exercising the British Birth rights as protected by the Lexicon. Being born British in Great Britain. We understand there will be contrarians citing balance of power etc. this is not a transfer of any such thing. it is a Briton exercising their British birth rights, in Britain. That's all.
The King cannot vote. If you are inspired by something the King said then keep listening. if you are minded not to listen, then just don't, you have that right too.
*The Wicked Treason Act 202?*
*Section 1 : Definition of Wicked Treason* (drafting)
(1) Any Elected or Unelected Representative or State Official or Employed by the British Citizenry who intentionally attempt to remove, undermine or interfere with a British Citizen's Rights and Freedoms, including but not limited to the Right to FREE SPEECH, shall be guilty of an offence hereby defined as *WICKED TREASON*
*Section 2 : Penalties for Wicked Treason*
(1) Any person convicted of Wicked Treason under this Act shall be liable to imprisonment for a term of 20 years
(2) Upon conviction, all assets of the person shall be subject to confiscation and shall become ward of the State for public disposal
*Section 3 : Interpretation*
(1) In this Act, "British Citizen" means a person holding British Citizenship.
(2) "Rights and Freedoms" means those Rights and Freedoms recognized by the laws of the United Kingdom, including common-law, statute law and constitutional Rights.
*Section 4 : Short Title and Commencement*
(1) This Act may be cited as the 'Wicked Treason Act'
(2) This Act shall come into force on the date (of the next change of government) applied retrospectively to the date of any offence of 'Wicked Treason'.
reference of interest: History;
(1) Original Text of the Charges Raised against King Charles l at his trial.
(2) Original Text of the verdict delivered
*Invasion of Privacy and Personal Copyright Act*
Section 1 : *Purpose and Scope*
This Act aims to protect the privacy and rights of British Citizens from unwanted advertising and Invasion of personal space
*Section 2 : Definitions*
*Invasion of Privacy*Includes but is not limited to:
- Unwanted advertisements through internet, postal service, or leaflet distribution.
- Collection, storage and use of personal data without explicit consent.
-*Personal Copyright* Refers to an individual's right to control their personal information and Agency over their own data.
*Agency of the Self* : Recognizes an individual's autonomy and decision-making capacity over their own data
*Section 3 : Invasion of Privacy and Personal Copyright Infringement*
- Any company invading the privacy of a British Citizen through unrequested advertising, or collection, storage or use of personal data without explicit, written consent shall be liable for personal copyright infringement
- The fine for each individual breach of privacy under personal copyright and Agency of the Self shall be the sum of £1,000 per advertisement or articles of personal, identifiable data of British Citizens
* Section 4 : Calculation of fines*
The total fine will be calculated based upon the number of individual breaches of privacy or data collection without express consent constituting a separate breach.
- The fine shall be payable to the affected British Citizen
*Section 5 : Enforcement and Remedies*
- Individuals may bring claims against companies invading their privacy and infringe upon their personal copyright
- Courts will award damages and grant injunctions to enforce compliance with this Act
*Section 6 : Prohibition on Mandatory Cookies*
Websites requiring the download of cookies as a condition of access or use shall be prohibited for operating in Great Britain
- Companies operating websites in Great Britain must ensure that British Citizens can access and use their services without being forced to consent to cookie downloads
*Section 7 : Cookie opt-in Requirement*
Companies may offer users the option of consent to cookie downloads , but British Citizens must be able to decline without penalty or restriction of service.
- Companies must provide clear and accessible information about cookie usage, including:
- Purpose of cookie deployment
- Type of data collected
- Duration of cookie storage
*Section 8 : Enforcement and Penalties*
-Companies failing to comply with these requirements shall be subject to penalties and fines under this Act
-The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) shall conduct a full forensic financial audit of companies found to be in breach of cookie regulations, specifically focusing on the sale of personal information of a British Citizen collected through cookies
- The audit shall aim to identify and quantify all revenue generated from the sale of personal data of a British Citizen, including any profits or financial benefits derived from such activities.
- The ICO shall have the power to:
- Demand financial records and documentation from offending companies
- Conduct unannounced on-site inspections and interviews with relevant personnel
- Impose fines and penalties on companies found to be in breach of regulations including disgorgement and transfer to the British Citizen, any profits made from their personal information
- The ICO shall publish a report detailing the findings of the audit and any subsequent actions taken ensuring anonymity of the offended British Citizen
The placing or operating of spyware or covert surveillance within electronic goods or equipment of a British Citizen will be liable to imprisonment
*British Banking*
Banking Licenses will be revoked from those banks and financial institutions who operate or practice a politically coercive banking policy, written or otherwise.
To address foreign banking and financial institutions deemed to be Politically coercive financial institutions, the UK would follow, established regulatory procedures.
Here's a breakdown:
*Licensing authority* The financial conduct authority (FCA) and the Prudential regulation authority (PRA) oversee banking licenses in the UK. They work together to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements.
*Withdrawal of license* If a foreign bank or financial institution is deemed politically coercive, the FSA and PRA will initiate license withdrawal proceedings. The decision will be based on specific criteria, such as non compliance with UK regulations or posing a risk to the financial stability of Great Britain.
*Criteria for withdrawal*. The criteria for withdrawal would include:
- ceasing activities, if the bank ceases to carry on regulated activities.
*Failure to Meet Requirements*: If the bank or financial institution no longer meets the requirements for authorisation, such as adequate capital, liquidity, governance standards or withholding British Citizen's money from the accounts of British Citizens, closing down the accounts of British Citizen along political or ideological lines.
We find this practice to be corporate embezzlement of private funds of British Citizens. (THEFT).
*Impact on UK operations*, If a foreign bank's license is withdrawn, it will no longer be able to operate as a bank or financial institution in the UK, This will involve:
- Ceasing Regulated Activities: The bank would need to stop providing regulated financial services, such as accepting deposits or making loans.
-Winding Down Operations: The bank will need to wind down its UK operations, including asset sales and transferring British Citizen accounts to the new British Citizen's Bank. 'The Treasury Bank'.
The UK's regulatory framework is designed to ensure the stability and integrity of our financial system. If a foreign bank is deemed to be politically coercive, the FSA & PRA will take action to protect the UK's financial interests and maintain public trust in our British Banking System.
Let’s Work Together
Get in touch so we can start working together.
